I think the attempt at objectification is even more harmful. (16) In my mind there are many truths, stories, memories. (15) I know most of the events from stories or my memory, or from copies of family documents. (14) In my use case, I don’t need this complex collection and evaluation of sources and resources. (12) Existing notes were recognized during the import, provided with an ID e.g. (11) A call entry in the sidebar >Tools > Import, then >Import_GEDCOM below would have helped me. (10) But before that I had to search around for a while to know and call this function. Added the Gramps ID to the name in the title for people with the same name. The handling of the ‘system’ with namesake seems to impress me. (09) Events and locations were also very well taken over. (08) According to my first impression, family relationships were well taken over and even represented correctly in the graphic representation. With around 176 entries of persons, 272 tiddlers became 697 tiddlers. (07) My Gedcom file was imported without any problems. (06) From my use case, I have the impression of Big Overhead, as if you wanted to shoot sparrows with a cannon. (05) Do you know whether or how many active users of ‘MK’ there are at the moment? (03) Very Important: Please take all of my feedback, as an offer, as my user experiences and impressions, feedback as a thank you for your efforts.Īnd we blame the rest on my limited English. (02) I think we both suffer from a similar ‘disease’: maybe building a good tool is more important than using it…? Then something of my whole network becomes visible, but there are also limitations against getting out of hand. (01) In order not to get out of hand in my text, I used the compass ‘my task at hand’. Hello and thank oh my god, you put a lot of work and time into it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |